You mean the guy with an MBA writing the report refuting the report that refutes the report refuting the original report? At which point another report is needed to determine whether we're for or against it. Plus another report to try and work out what the original question was. At which point, the lawyers are called in, tripling the budget. Then there's a change in government and the whole thing gets shelved.

https://www.reddit.com/r/recruitinghell/comments/13qk89s/due_to_cutbacks/